Abbott wades into CSG debate

In my last blog on coal seam gas (28 June – Temperature rises on coal seam gas) I warned of the political dangers facing the new NSW liberal-national party coalition government around the rapidly growing debate over coal seam gas extraction on private farm land.

Potential impacts on groundwater resources and surface streams are a big part of the public concerns, although the broader environmental and aesthetic elements of gas heads spread across private farms and rural landscapes are part of the story too.

I said then, and nothing has changed since, that the NSW state government will have to very carefully balance the interests of its own coalition – the traditional Liberal* party support for big business (the mining industry in this case) and the rural and farming concerns of the National Party.

NSW Liberal Premier (Governor for US readers) Barry O’Farrell and his ministerial colleagues have played a fairly careful hand around this issue in recent months – obviously aware of the delicate political balancing act they are facing.

However, Federal ‘opposition’ leader, Tony Abbott (head of the Federal Liberal-National coalition) seems not to have taken O’Farrell’s cautious lead, diving head long into the debate last week.  Abbott decried that farmers should be able to stop coal seam gas companies ‘forcing’ their way onto their land.

Not only was this at logger-heads with the mining and business interests of his own party,  but it put him in direct conflict with long-standing mining laws in Australia that effectively guarantee mining companies access to mineral resources underneath private land (subject to a range of regulatory approvals)

Ironically, Abbott quickly found himself being courted by the Green Party, which came out in support of his apparent ‘anti-mining, pro-farming’ stance.  The Greens concerns lie more with the possible environmental consequences of CSG extraction, rather than with the farmers per se, nevertheless they saw Abbott as an ally, albeit a strange one, in the CSG issue.

Abbott was then very quick to point out to the media that there was no chance of an alliance between his party and the Greens on the CSG issue, or on any other issue for that matter!  The Greens hold the balance of power in our Federal parliament, and are disparaged by Abbott and his conservative colleagues on almost every political issue they raise.

Realising the political wedge he had walked into, later in the week Abbott backed off from his overtly pro-farming stance, trying to strike a more conciliatory tone saying “We support the mining industry but we don’t want to see prime agricultural land destroyed”.  He tried to pass that red hot political potato back to the States stating, “land use decisions ….are fundamentally a matter for the States”.

Beyond all this political advancing and retreating remains the need for a proper scientific analysis on the possible ground- and surface-water impacts of CSG extraction in Australia.  Our national science organisation CSIRO last month announced a research alliance with Australia Pacific LNG.  Hopefully that will help bring some scientific rationality to what has become a very emotive public debate.

I am guessing that there will be some in the farming and environmental community worrying that CSIRO risks getting too close to the CSG industry. Clearly, CSIRO will need to be extremely careful how it manages the relationship with CSG companies, and how it protects the integrity of its research and research publication process.  But, given CSIRO’s strong reputation for independence  I am confident they will walk that tight-rope wisely.


*Overseas readers should note that Australia’s ‘Liberal’ party is,  strangely enough given its name, our largest conservative party (the equivalent of the US Republican Party, or near enough so). It has a long-standing coalition agreement with the rural-leaning, and even more conservative, National Party.  The incumbent Federal ‘Labor’ Government is akin to the US Democratic Party.

4 thoughts on “Abbott wades into CSG debate

  1. Dear Mr. Jones,
    The CSIRO have been doing extensive research on CSG in Australia for some time.
    Funded by the taxpayers of this country for and on behalf of the mining industry.
    The CSIRO website is full to the brim of studies on their behalf and this has been a planned exercise for some years.
    You are so right re concerns about the water in the Great Artesian Basin and the potential wreaking of havoc if fault lines are breached or should we say, when, between aquifers from the ginormous amount of water pressure the miners will use to frack the coal seams and drilling, drilling, in some cases ie Eastern Star Gas soon to be SANTOS drilling of 500 CSG wells in the Pilliga State Forest, with only Where we are in the North West of NSW on the black soil plains west of Narrabri, Wee Waa and the Walgett areas there is very little known knowledge of the fault lines and interconnectivity. Also the complete inability of broadacre farming to co exist with gas wells is a major concern for us.
    Where the CSIRO and the governments are concerned unless they commence independant studies into our aquifers and the possible detrimental effects to our part of the GAB long term there is every possibility, once you read the extent these miners want to go for the CSG, that irreversible damage may be on the horizon.
    Our future generations of Australians will have to deal with these irreversible effects for ever and a day. Geoscience Australia have scientists with reservations, the Department of Water have reservations and Australians have reservations.
    How can you help us ? We really need your public support for a Moratorium in NSW until further studies are completed. The mining companies mantra of “Come on,take the money and run” by the Steve Miller Band is being played in QLD this very minute. The Beatles “Revolution” should be on every NewSouthwWelshmans lips from now until our food and water security is absolutely secured tight as a fishs ar..
    as the saying goes. How can you help us, Thankyou and Best Wishes
    Victoria Hamilton

    • Yes Julio, its more than an interesting debate ,its the absolute determination of the remaining foundation farmlands of Australia, (though I am referring specifically to NSW,) to supplying the generations of Australians to come with the availability of clean healthy food as opposed to your eventual reliance on all foreign imports of food.

      If the productive farmlands and water are obliterated, it will be on the heads of the present politicians and to the detriment of all Australians for generations and generations to come .

      Tony Burke has stated that each aquifer should be tested to prove if there is interconnectivity and while that is worthwhile to some degree he still doesnt understand that the process of fracturing the coal seams either with vertical drilling or hydraulic fracturing, will in itself cause possible and probable fault openings allowing the interconnectivity of aquifers and depressurising of the GAB. Demand a Moratorium now till all these things are reported and proven safe. The gas isnt going anywhere, so lets take the seriousness of this threat to the GAB and the foundation farmlands on behalf of all Australians present and future right up to the politicians who have the future lives of Australians in their hands.

      MORATORIUM NOW ,your children and your childrens children will thankyou for your intelligence and concern for their wellbeing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s